Search results
Search for "ruthenium metathesis catalyst" in Full Text gives 3 result(s) in Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry.
Hoveyda–Grubbs catalysts with an N→Ru coordinate bond in a six-membered ring. Synthesis of stable, industrially scalable, highly efficient ruthenium metathesis catalysts and 2-vinylbenzylamine ligands as their precursors
- Kirill B. Polyanskii,
- Kseniia A. Alekseeva,
- Pavel V. Raspertov,
- Pavel A. Kumandin,
- Eugeniya V. Nikitina,
- Atash V. Gurbanov and
- Fedor I. Zubkov
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2019, 15, 769–779, doi:10.3762/bjoc.15.73
- ; cross metathesis; Hoveyda–Grubbs catalyst; olefin metathesis; RCM; ring-closing metathesis; ring-opening cross metathesis; ROCM; ruthenium metathesis catalyst; styrene; 2-vinylbenzylamine; Introduction Ruthenium-catalysed olefin metathesis reactions have been playing an important role in various fields
Graphical Abstract
Figure 1: Commercially available ruthenium catalysts for metathesis reactions.
Figure 2: Retrosynthesis of the ruthenium catalysts.
Scheme 1: Efficient multigram synthesis of N,N-dialkyl-2-vinylbenzylamines 4 (R1X = Me2SO4, Et2SO4 or BnCl, s...
Scheme 2: Synthesis of N-(2-ethenylbenzyl)heterocycles 5.
Scheme 3: Synthesis of N-monoalkyl-2-vinylbenzylamine 7.
Scheme 4: Synthesis of Hoveyda–Grubbs-type catalysts 11.
Scheme 5: Synthesis of the “chloroform adduct” 9.
Figure 3: Selected X-ray data for ruthenium complexes 11a–c. All hydrogen atoms were deleted for clarity (exc...
Scheme 6: Catalytic activity of compounds 11 in the metathesis reactions.
Ruthenium-based olefin metathesis catalysts with monodentate unsymmetrical NHC ligands
- Veronica Paradiso,
- Chiara Costabile and
- Fabia Grisi
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2018, 14, 3122–3149, doi:10.3762/bjoc.14.292
- and electronic properties of the NHC ligand. Significant advances in ruthenium metathesis catalyst design have been achieved by the introduction of unsymmetrically substituted NHC (uNHC) ligands, namely presenting different substituents at the nitrogen atoms. They offer the possibility of strongly
Graphical Abstract
Figure 1: Second-generation Grubbs (GII), Hoveyda (HGII), Grela (Gre-II), Blechert (Ble-II) and indenylidene-...
Figure 2: Grubbs (1a) and Hoveyda-type (1b) complexes with N-phenyl, N’-mesityl NHCs.
Figure 3: C–H insertion product 2.
Figure 4: Grubbs (3a–6a) and Hoveyda-type (3b–6b) complexes with N-fluorophenyl, N’-aryl NHCs.
Scheme 1: RCM of diethyl diallylmalonate (7).
Scheme 2: RCM of diethyl allylmethallylmalonate (9).
Scheme 3: RCM of diethyl dimethallylmalonate (11).
Scheme 4: CM of allylbenzene (13) with cis-1,4-diacetoxy-2-butene (14).
Scheme 5: ROMP of 1,5-cyclooctadiene (16).
Figure 5: Grubbs (18a–21a) and Hoveyda-type (18b–21b) catalysts bearing uNHCs with a hexafluoroisopropylalkox...
Figure 6: A Grubbs-type complex with an N-adamantyl, N’-mesityl NHC 22 and the Hoveyda-type complex with a ch...
Figure 7: Grubbs (24a and 25a) and Hoveyda-type (24b and 25b) complexes with N-alkyl, N’-mesityl NHCs.
Figure 8: Grubbs-type complexes 31–34 with N-alkyl, N’-mesityl NHCs.
Figure 9: Grubbs-type complex 35 with an N-cyclohexyl, N’-2,6-diisopropylphenyl NHC.
Figure 10: Hoveyda-type complexes with an N-alkyl, N’-mesityl (36, 37) and an N-alkyl, N’-2,6-diisopropylpheny...
Figure 11: Indenylidene-type complexes 41–43 with N-alkyl, N’-mesityl NHCs.
Figure 12: Grubbs-type complex 44 and its monopyridine derivative 45 containing a chiral uNHC.
Scheme 6: Alternating copolymerization of 46 with 47 and 48.
Figure 13: Pyridine-containing complexes 49–52 and Grubbs-type complex 53.
Figure 14: Hoveyda-type complexes 54–58 in the alternating ROMP of NBE (46) and COE (47).
Figure 15: Catalysts 59 and 60 in the tandem RO–RCM of 47.
Figure 16: Hoveyda-type complexes 61–69 with N-alkyl, N’-aryl NHCs.
Scheme 7: Ethenolysis of methyl oleate (70).
Scheme 8: AROCM of cis-5-norbornene-endo-2,3-dicarboxylic anhydride (75) with styrene.
Figure 17: Hoveyda-type catalysts 79–82 with N-tert-butyl, N’-aryl NHCs.
Scheme 9: Latent ROMP of 83 with catalyst 82.
Figure 18: Indenylidene and Hoveyda-type complexes 85–92 with N-cycloalkyl, N’-mesityl NHCs.
Scheme 10: RCM of N,N-dimethallyl-N-tosylamide (93) with catalyst 85.
Scheme 11: Self metathesis of 13 with catalyst 85.
Figure 19: Grubbs-type complexes 98–104 with N-alkyl, N’-mesityl NHCs.
Figure 20: Grubbs-type complexes 105–115 with N-alkyl, N’-mesityl ligands.
Figure 21: Complexes 116 and 117 bearing a carbohydrate-based NHC.
Figure 22: Complexes 118 and 119 bearing a hemilabile amino-tethered NHC.
Figure 23: Indenylidene-type complexes 120–126 with N-benzyl, N’-mesityl NHCs.
Scheme 12: Diastereoselective ring-rearrangement metathesis (dRRM) of cyclopentene 131.
Figure 24: Indenylidene-type complexes 134 and 135 with N-nitrobenzyl, N’-mesityl NHCs.
Figure 25: Hoveyda-type complexes 136–138 with N-benzyl, N’-mesityl NHCs.
Figure 26: Hoveyda-type complexes 139–142 with N-benzyl, N’-Dipp NHC.
Figure 27: Indenylidene (143–146) and Hoveyda-type (147) complexes with N-heteroarylmethyl, N’-mesityl NHCs.
Figure 28: Hoveyda-type complexes 148 and 149 with N-phenylpyrrole, N’-mesityl NHCs.
Figure 29: Grubbs-type complexes with N-trifluoromethyl benzimidazolidene NHCs 150–153, 155 and N-isopropyl be...
Scheme 13: Ethenolysis of ethyl oleate 156.
Scheme 14: Ethenolysis of cis-cyclooctene (47).
Figure 30: Grubbs-type C1-symmetric (164) and C2-symmetric (165) catalysts with a backbone-substituted NHC.
Figure 31: Possible syn and anti rotational isomers of catalyst 164.
Scheme 15: ARCM of substrates 166, 168 and 170.
Figure 32: Hoveyda (172) and Grubbs-type (173,174) backbone-substituted C1-symmetric NHC complexes.
Scheme 16: ARCM of 175,177 and 179 with catalyst 174.
Figure 33: Grubbs-type C1-symmetric NHC catalysts bearing N-propyl (181, 182) or N-benzyl (183, 184) groups on...
Scheme 17: ARCM of 185 and 187 promoted by 184 to form the encumbered alkenes 186 and 188.
Figure 34: N-Alkyl, N’-isopropylphenyl NHC ruthenium complexes with syn (189, 191) and anti (190, 192) phenyl ...
Figure 35: Hoveyda-type complexes 193–198 bearing N-alkyl, N’-aryl backbone-substituted NHC ligands.
Scheme 18: ARCM of 166 and 199 promoted by 192b.
Figure 36: Enantiopure catalysts 201a and 201b with syn phenyl units on the NHC backbone.
Figure 37: Backbone-monosubstituted catalysts 202–204.
Figure 38: Grubbs (205a) and Hoveyda-type (205b) backbone-monosubstituted catalysts.
Scheme 19: AROCM of 206 with allyltrimethylsilane promoted by catalyst 205a.
New metathesis catalyst bearing chromanyl moieties at the N-heterocyclic carbene ligand
- Agnieszka Hryniewicka,
- Szymon Suchodolski,
- Agnieszka Wojtkielewicz,
- Jacek W. Morzycki and
- Stanisław Witkowski
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2015, 11, 2795–2804, doi:10.3762/bjoc.11.300
- ruthenium catalysts. Selected ruthenium metathesis catalyst bearing chromanyl moieties. π-Complex and rutenacyclobutane intermediate with a five-membered ring chelate. Numbering of carbon atoms in the chromanyl moiety. Synthesis of the new NHC precursor. Reagents and conditions: a) HNO3, CH2Cl2, 0 °C, 58
Graphical Abstract
Figure 1: Examples of olefin metathesis ruthenium catalysts.
Figure 2: Selected ruthenium metathesis catalyst bearing chromanyl moieties.
Scheme 1: Synthesis of the new NHC precursor. Reagents and conditions: a) HNO3, CH2Cl2, 0 °C, 58%; b) HOCH2SO...
Scheme 2: CM with electron-deficient olefin.
Scheme 3: Possible products of metathesis reaction between diene and alkene.
Figure 3: π-Complex and rutenacyclobutane intermediate with a five-membered ring chelate.
Scheme 4: CM reaction of β-carotene and retinyl acetate with ethyl (2E,4Z/E)-3-methylhexa-2,4-dienoate. React...
Figure 4: Numbering of carbon atoms in the chromanyl moiety.
